I was surprised to discover that instead of developing this idea further, what followed was a series of short chapters--one or two pages each--of unrelated ideas. It was like reading a series of blog posts, or a book proposal. By about the thirteenth one, I wanted to scream.

I blame at least 75% of my frustration with this book on the editor. It's an editor's job to say, "You're not done here," or "This isn't an essay yet...you have to take this further, work a lot harder...you need to pick a destination and take us there." And if this doesn't work, it's an editor's job to help us realize that if we only have a few paragraphs worth of thoughts on an idea, then it probably shouldn't go in a book yet (unless it's startlingly personal, new, or completely different than anything anyone else has said on the subject. I think each of us get perhaps three such allowances over the course of a lifetime).
But publishing is in a strange place right now, and editors have less and less time/capacity to edit. So this becomes our job as writers. The rules don't change. If there's no one to push us, we need to push ourselves. This requires more patience than most of us have (that's me, waving my hand, wanting to be done before I've started), and a willingness to live without the euphoria/relief of saying "It's Finished!" for a few more months. But this is our job, and I'm grateful that this book crossed my path to remind me.
This author has other books, and I'm excited to read them. Her opening chapter did it's job: it made me want more of what she had to say, even about things I don't agree with.
Disclosure: I received a copy of this book from the publisher. There was no obligation to post a positive review.